home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT2722>
- <title>
- Oct. 16, 1989: The Presidency
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- Oct. 16, 1989 The Ivory Trail
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 28
- The Presidency
- Is Bush Bold Enough?
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By Hugh Sidey
- </p>
- <p> The question has taken root in the power circles of
- Washington. It is thrown up at every White House briefing.
- Congress, like a hungry dog with a new bone, is jubilantly
- chewing on it. The question will echo down through George Bush's
- remaining years of stewardship and on into history unless he has
- some miracle up his sleeve or gets a little of Ronald Reagan's
- luck. So far, he has not had an oversupply of either.
- </p>
- <p> Did a moment come and go last week in which raw U.S. power
- should have been used quickly and decisively? It is one of the
- oldest and most difficult questions in the two centuries of the
- American presidency. Almost every occupant of the Oval Office
- has had to answer it at some time. In our age, Jimmy Carter
- hesitated on Iran and was dumped. Ronald Reagan's boldness in
- Libya and Grenada elevated his presidency.
- </p>
- <p> Bush has been hailed for his restraint in the troubles
- besetting the Soviet Union, China, Poland, Hungary and,
- earlier, Panama. But there has always lurked the probability
- that sooner rather than later, U.S. muscle would be needed to
- subdue a tyrant. In the minds of many, a doubt has lingered from
- last year's presidential campaign over whether Bush had the
- heart to use power. The explanations of inaction from his
- Secretaries of State and Defense and his White House staff have
- echoes of almost every sad incident of our times, going back to
- Pearl Harbor. Bush's caution will probably not displease the
- bulk of American people now. But history sorts out the facts and
- is a harsher judge, not influenced by popularity polls.
- </p>
- <p> "The oldest rule in the exercise of power is that if a
- nation tells the world it wants to get rid of a corrupt
- government, as the U.S. did in Panama, that nation had better
- have the means and the will to carry it through once an
- opportunity develops." So spoke old cold warrior Richard Helms,
- former director of the CIA, last week.
- </p>
- <p> That the situation in Panama was confused and information
- inadequate is nothing new for such incidents. Former Secretary
- of State Henry Kissinger, a crisis manager of considerable
- success, claims that in almost every crunch there is never
- enough information and always uncertainty, and the final
- decision must frequently ride more on a President's intuition
- than his briefing books. That is what leadership is all about.
- </p>
- <p> "We were not sure what was happening, but I felt something
- had to be done" was the way Gerald Ford explained his recapture
- of the cargo ship Mayaguez in the Gulf of Thailand in 1975.
- "Let's do it" was Reagan's simple command that sent F-14 pilots
- aloft on a risky mission in the Mediterranean that apprehended
- and forced down the Egyptian airliner carrying the hijackers of
- the cruise ship Achille Lauro.
- </p>
- <p> So far, the facts seem stacked against Bush. But he has not
- had his day in public, and his command process is more secretive
- than that of any recent President. We know that young
- Panamanian officers responded to U.S. pressure to rid their
- country of Manuel Noriega, that we were aware of the plot,
- involved to some undetermined degree and that a few yards away
- were some of the 12,000 trained and armed American troops
- stationed in Panama. Does opportunity ever knock so hard?
- </p>
- <p> Did Bush know? Was he too preoccupied with his busy White
- House schedule, not attentive enough to this festering problem?
- Was it a time when intuition should have prodded him to act?
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-